ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER

Judge John Roberts is perceived as a strict constitutional conservative and is being held up as an example of George W. Bush also being conservative. The Bush Scorecard blogs put the lie to that claim, and this one exposes Roberts as a typical Bushite phony. To praise or blast blogmaster, email Teno@new.rr.com.

Name:
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States

Read the rest of the profile! And check out my websites and weblogs.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

ROBERTS REPUDIATES the BIBLE


http://www.covenantnews.com/newswire/archives/015009.html

http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=395

John Roberts’ Shocking Repudiation Of The Bible As The Standard For His Judging

ROBERTS REPUDIATES the BIBLE

Our 23rd nationally-syndicated, one-hour radio show, “The American View,” co-hosted by myself (Constitution Party Presidential candidate Michael Peroutka) and “recovering Republican” John Lofton, was broadcast this past Sunday in 38 cities in 22 states.

On this program, we discuss John Roberts’ shocking, un-American repudiation of the Bible as his standard for judging and the shameful silence from so-called “Christian leaders” about this statement which alone disqualifies him from being a judge. We also discuss the abysmal ignorance and Constitutional illiteracy of so many of Roberts’ interrogators on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

John Roberts was answering questions from ultra-liberal Sen. Diane Feinstein. She was not even asking him about God or the Bible. Roberts actually offered up this repudiation of God and the Bible by himself.

Here is what Judge Roberts averred:

"I do know this, that my faith and my religious beliefs do not play a role in judging. When it comes to judging, I look to the law books, and always have. I don't look to the Bible or any other religious source."

Jay Sekulow said this was a "fantastic response" when being interviewed by an assenting Pat Robertson. Other conservatives are excusing the comment as something Roberts *had* to say before the committee (wink, wink), but probably doesn't hold in reality. So the best defense offered for Judge Roberts is that he LIED under oath to Congress and America.

Of course without the Bible, there is no foundation for law, it can change with the breeze, and have no semblance to morality, justice, or righteousness. America was founded with the Bible as the final arbiter for determining that things like murder and stealing are wrong. Roberts is repudiating the foundation of American justice. He says the Bible doesn't even play a role in his judging. He has no foundation for determining law, justice, or right and wrong. He is a virtual ATHEIST when it comes to being a Supreme Court justice.

In another issue covered here before, Roberts also said he didn't find anything "morally objectionable" in being involved in the Romer v. Evans case which forces employers (churches?) and landlords to accept sodomites. I wonder then why he originally didn't include that case in his 67 page list of pro-bono cases he worked on?

http://robertsrules.blogspot.com/2005/08/roberts-aided-sodomites.html

Christians will have to give account to God for supporting this pro-queer, pro-abortion, pro-pornography, anti-Bible, virtual atheist, and for promoting him as a "Conservative".

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home